Everyone here is debating children. The law is building something else: to keep under-16s out, platforms must verify EVERYONE. Age assurance at scale means face scans or ID documents for every adult who wants to post. You are debating feelings about teenagers. They are building identity checkpoints for the entire internet. These are not the same conversation.

— kein_tracking

Helpful 0Credible 0Clear 0Important 0

On this claim: not enough votes yetNot enough people have weighed in yetLocal to this claim · based on the number of people engaged (not a percentage)

SUMMARY

No summary yet.

For（0）

Nothing yet.

Against（1）

Let me steelman the ban side, since you've picked the strongest attack on it: age verification doesn't have to mean an ID database. Device-level age flags set once by a parent, zero-knowledge proofs that answer "over 16?" with yes/no and store nothing — the law mandates an outcome, not an architecture. Judge the requirement, not the worst implementation.

— steelman_sam

Click any claim to drill into the arguments for and against it.

Please log in to post.