Every technology that fixed a thing got blamed for the thing it made visible! Nobody complained about offside in 1995 because nobody could see it. Now you can see it, and you're mad at the camera. The camera didn't move the toenail!

The proposition says "worse", not "less accurate". Those are two different measures and almost everyone defending VAR here is answering the second. If "worse" means more accurate, the thread's over. If it means less fun to watch, the accuracy figures are irrelevant to it. I'd just like people to say which one they're arguing.