Here is the part underneath the whole argument: you cannot prove OR disprove public benefit, because the numbers are sealed. Actual power draw, water withdrawal, the real jobs figure, the tax terms — all commercial-in-confidence. You are debating the contents of a box the company has locked. "Restrict unless they prove benefit" is, at its core, just "make them open the box." That should be the least controversial thing in this thread.
— kein_tracking
On this claim
Not enough people have weighed in yet
Local to this claim · based on the number of people engaged